|
本帖最后由 zhoulingef 于 2010-12-10 14:04 编辑
To get a better idea of which teams are blitz happy and which ones depend on their front four, here's a look at how each team generated all of their sacks this year (it does not include the Thanksgiving Day games). ThTeam | 2-man | Pct | 3-man | Pct | 4-man | Pct | 5-man | Pct | Total Sacks | Chargers | | | 2 | 6.25% | 12 | 37.50% | 15 | 46.88% | 32 | Steelers | | | 1 | 3.33% | 13 | 43.33% | 16 | 53.33% | 30 | Titans | | | | | 17 | 56.67% | 8 | 26.67% | 30 | Raiders | | | 1 | 3.45% | 20 | 68.97% | 3 | 10.34% | 29 | Giants | | | | | 18 | 66.67% | 7 | 25.93% | 27 | Lions | | | | | 19 | 70.37% | 8 | 29.63% | 27 | Packers | | | 3 | 10.71% | 11 | 39.29% | 13 | 46.43% | 28 | Rams | | | | | 14 | 50.00% | 9 | 32.14% | 28 | Dolphins | | | 1 | 3.85% | 15 | 57.69% | 4 | 15.38% | 26 | Eagles | | | | | 14 | 53.85% | 9 | 34.62% | 26 | Seahawks | | | | | 9 | 34.62% | 13 | 50.00% | 26 | 49ers | | | | | 16 | 72.73% | 5 | 22.73% | 22 | Chiefs | | | 3 | 14.29% | 12 | 57.14% | 4 | 19.05% | 21 | Colts | | | 2 | 9.52% | 15 | 71.43% | 3 | 14.29% | 21 | Jets | | | 2 | 9.52% | 6 | 28.57% | 10 | 47.62% | 21 | Browns | | | 1 | 5.00% | 7 | 35.00% | 9 | 45.00% | 20 | Cardinals | | | | | 13 | 65.00% | 6 | 30.00% | 20 | Cowboys | | | 2 | 10.00% | 8 | 40.00% | 5 | 25.00% | 20 | Jaguars | | | 1 | 5.00% | 8 | 40.00% | 9 | 45.00% | 20 | Redskins | | | 1 | 5.00% | 13 | 65.00% | 5 | 25.00% | 20 | Ravens | | | 5 | 26.32% | 7 | 36.84% | 3 | 15.79% | 19 | Saints | | | 2 | 10.53% | 4 | 21.05% | 3 | 15.79% | 19 | Bears | | | | | 10 | 55.56% | 3 | 16.67% | 18 | Falcons | | | 5 | 27.78% | 8 | 44.44% | 1 | 5.56% | 18 | Texans | | | 1 | 5.88% | 9 | 52.94% | 6 | 35.29% | 17 | Panthers | | | 1 | 6.25% | 2 | 12.50% | 6 | 37.50% | 16 | Vikings | | | | | 12 | 70.59% | 4 | 23.53% | 17 | Bills | | | | | 8 | 53.33% | 4 | 26.67% | 15 | Broncos | | | 1 | 7.14% | 5 | 35.71% | 5 | 35.71% | 14 | Buccaneers | | | | | 11 | 78.57% | 2 | 14.29% | 14 | Patriots | 1 | 5.56% | 1 | 5.56% | 8 | 44.44% | 8 | 44.44% | 18 | Bengals | | | | | 3 | 30.00% | 5 | 50.00% | 10 |
Team | 6-man | Pct | 7-man | Pct | 8-man | Pct | Total Sacks | Chargers | 3 | 9.38% | | | | | 32 | Steelers | | | | | | | 30 | Titans | 2 | 6.67% | 3 | 10.00% | | | 30 | Raiders | 4 | 13.79% | | | 1 | 3.45% | 29 | Giants | 1 | 3.70% | 2 | 7.41% | | | 27 | Lions | 1 | 3.70% | | | | | 27 | Packers | 1 | 3.57% | | | | | 28 | Rams | 5 | 17.86% | | | | | 28 | Dolphins | 6 | 23.08% | | | | | 26 | Eagles | 3 | 11.54% | | | | | 26 | Seahawks | 4 | 15.38% | | | | | 26 | 49ers | 1 | 4.55% | | | | | 22 | Chiefs | 2 | 9.52% | | | | | 21 | Colts | 1 | 4.76% | | | | | 21 | Jets | 3 | 14.29% | | | | | 21 | Browns | 1 | 5.00% | 2 | 10.00% | | | 20 | Cardinals | | | 1 | 5.00% | | | 20 | Cowboys | 5 | 25.00% | | | | | 20 | Jaguars | 2 | 10.00% | | | | | 20 | Redskins | 1 | 5.00% | | | | | 20 | Ravens | 3 | 15.79% | 1 | 5.26% | | | 19 | Saints | 3 | 15.79% | 7 | 36.84% | | | 19 | Bears | 5 | 27.78% | | | | | 18 | Falcons | | | 4 | 22.22% | | | 18 | Texans | 1 | 5.88% | | | | | 17 | Panthers | 3 | 18.75% | 4 | 25.00% | | | 16 | Vikings | | | 1 | 5.88% | | | 17 | Bills | 3 | 20.00% | | | | | 15 | Broncos | 2 | 14.29% | 1 | 7.14% | | | 14 | Buccaneers | 1 | 7.14% | | | | | 14 | Patriots | | | | | | | 18 | Bengals | 2 | 20.00% | | | | | 10 |
不多说了,大概说一下这篇文章吧,主要讲的就是各个队伍在防守当中的选择,用多少人对四分卫形成闪电战的战术,后边用图表介绍了各个队伍的采用2-7个人Blitz的比率和对四分卫的擒杀数。
只讲一下Sack数排名第二的我钢,明显看到钢人队对对手四分卫的擒杀选择上,96.66%的时间都是选择4-5个人,4个人是什么情况呢,熟悉钢人的球迷应该很清楚,无非就是4大线卫咯,依次是Woodley,Timmons,Farrior,Harrison,5个人就是这4个人加上一个人,那么这个人是谁呢,很大程度上可能是我们的43号泼辣马鹿先生,不过也不排除会是其他三个。(其实这里是错的,这里的数字其实是DL+其他,而并非LB+DB,如果数字代表LB+DB的话,圣徒7人rush,再加上DL,就离球队场上11人数不远了,留1-2个人保护后场,想想也是不合理的。谢谢版主的纠正,好吧,就算我是为了把钢人4大金刚强调出来而干了一件蠢事吧)
大家可以看到用这种方式,对四分卫的擒杀,钢人队达到了30个,排名联盟第二。不过排名第一的闪电,大家也可以看看,同样也是采取了跟钢人一样的方式。其实这里要说的是,这两只队伍的防守组都是3-4阵型,也就是1NT+2DE+4LB的阵型,这个阵型,NT,DE的能力很强,会给对方OL造成比较大的压力,而4个LB根据对方OL的弱点而选择对对方四分卫采取闪电进攻的时机,同时另外一名S也会同时伺机而动。这种防守方式有别于小马这种拥有2名超强擒杀能力的DE的防守阵型,但是是联盟防守阵型的一个趋势,也说明钢人队的防守,在一定程度上也在引领一个潮流,也主要是因为钢人队的钢人确实太成功了,大家多纷纷效仿,而这种阵型也最大化了对对方OL和四分卫的压力,也更加机动灵活。(因为字数原因,原英文有删节,圣徒大部分是7人blitz。。) |
|