达阵联盟-NFL-美式橄榄球中文网

 找回密码
 加入【达阵联盟】

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 1614|回复: 16

[海鹰] [翻译贴]海鹰的防守在联盟历史中找到位置

  [复制链接]
发表于 2014-12-25 22:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 lihancheng 于 2014-12-25 23:15 编辑

Seahawks' defense finding place in league history
海鹰的防守在联盟历史中找到位置

By TIM BOOTH (AP Sports Writer)
16 hours ago

RENTON, Wash. (AP) -- In the locker room after stifling Arizona, Michael Bennett was holding court, more than happy to proclaim this Seattle Seahawks' defense as the best all-time.
Renton, 华盛顿州(美联社)——在暴揍亚利桑那之后的海鹰队更衣室里,防守端锋Michael Bennett享受着这一切,并无比开心的宣告这支西雅图海鹰队的防守可以排到联盟历史第一位。

Certainly it was bombastic and the opinion of just one player. Yet Bennett might have been on to something. Maybe not the point of Seattle's defense being mentioned in the same breath of the best all-time, but certainly one of the best defenses of this era.
但是当然这句话会有些夸大成分,而且只是一个球员的个人见解。但是Bennett的话还确实是有些道理的。虽然可能海鹰的防守并没有像他说的那样能与历史最佳比肩,但是海鹰的防守确实是一个时代里面的最佳了。

''It's cool for (Bennett) to say it. Obviously we'd love to be in that discussion, but I wouldn't say it,'' Seattle cornerback Richard Sherman said. ''There's been some great defenses to play out there. I think we'd be in the discussion to be one of the best defenses, especially this year and last year, and what we've done on a consistent bases year in and year out.’’
“Bennett说这些话还是挺酷的。很明显我们愿意出现在这类的讨论中,但是我可能不会这样说吧。”海鹰队角卫Richard Sherman如是说,“之前也有很多队伍打出了非常棒的防守的。我觉得我们可以加入有关最佳防守球队的讨论,特别是今年和去年,还有就是我们可以年复一年打出稳定的防守表现。”

Depending on what happens in the season finale Sunday against St. Louis, the Seahawks have a chance to place themselves into the conversation among the best in this era. Even if the numbers don't translate directly between generations - with differences in player skills and rules - what Seattle has accomplished is noteworthy in a historical context.
在美国时间周日打圣路易斯公羊的常规赛收官战结束后,海鹰队有机会把自己加入本时代最佳防守球队的讨论中去。即使是现在的数据并不能直接体现不同时代球队的表现(因为比赛规则和球员的技巧有很大的不同),西雅图所获得的成就绝对是值得在历史上找到一个很好的位置的。

''You have to rate defenses in their own time periods, because the rules today, I don't know if the defenses back then would be as good, and they were killing quarterbacks and they'd probably get ejected out of games for half of the stuff they were doing back then,'' Sherman said. ''But those were the rules back then that they played by, and they played the game at a high level, but like you said, the game has changed.’'
“你必须在特定的时代中才能去评判一支球队防守好坏,因为我只是知道现在的比赛规则,我并不知道以前的第二防线是不是和我们一样好,而且以前他们简直会‘杀死’那些四分卫,而且可能一大半他们所做的事情都可能会让他们被罚出场,”Sherman如是说,“但是那是那个时候的规则了,他们遵循那个时候的规则,而且他们把比赛打到了很高的水准,但是就像你说的,如今的比赛都变了。”

Seattle enters Week 17 leading the NFL in total yards allowed, points allowed, yards passing allowed and ranks third in yards rushing allowed. Last season, the Seahawks led the NFL in total defense (273.6 yards per game) and scoring defense (14.4 points).
西雅图在本赛季第17周之前在对手场均码数、场均失分、对手场均传球码数三个方面都排名NFL首位,而且也在对手场均跑攻码数这个方面排名第三。上赛季,海鹰队在对手总码数(场均失273.6码)和场均失分(场均失14.4分)上都排名联盟第一。

It's almost a certainty the Seahawks will finish this season as the leaders in total defense. Seattle and Detroit are the only two teams in the league giving up less than 300 yards per game and the Seahawks have a nearly 30-yard advantage over the Lions. Seattle also has a slight edge over the Lions in points allowed.
海鹰队在本赛季结束时各项防守指标排名联盟第一已经基本是板上钉钉的事了。西雅图和底特律雄狮是联盟里唯二的球队可以将对手总码数限制在场均300码以内,而且海鹰队在这项数据上还领先雄狮差不多30码。除此之外,西雅图还在场均失分方面跟雄狮队对比有一点点优势。

And if Seattle can finish the season as leaders of those two categories it will join rare company.
如果西雅图可以在以上两个方面排名第一结束这个赛季的话,它就将挤进历史中为数不多的防守超级强队的行列中。

''We're definitely playing really good ball right now and it's definitely going to be something to talk about later on in the years,'' Seattle linebacker Bobby Wagner said.
“我们现在绝对是在打非常棒的橄榄球,而且这也肯定会是之后一些年大家会讨论到的一个话题。”西雅图的防守线卫Bobby Wagner如是说。

According to STATS, only three teams in league history have led the league in yards allowed and points allowed in consecutive seasons: the 1954-55 Cleveland Browns, the 1969-70 Minnesota Vikings and the 1985-86 Chicago Bears.
根据STATS网站的数据,联盟历史上只有三支球队在连续两个赛季中在场均对手总码数和场均失分两方面都排名第一的:1954-55赛季的克利夫兰布朗队,1969-70赛季的明尼苏达维京人队,还有1985-86赛季的芝加哥熊队。

But what could separate Seattle as the best of this era is its scoring defense. Only two teams in league history have led the NFL in scoring defense in three straight seasons. Cleveland did it for five straight seasons from 1953-57, and Minnesota was the best scoring defense in the league between 1969-71.
但是能够把西雅图从“本时代最佳防守”提升到更高层次的一项技统是场均失分。联盟历史上只有两支球队能够在连续三个赛季(或以上)场均失分都排名联盟首位。布朗队在1953-57年间的连续五年做到了这点,明尼苏达在1969-71年间场均失分联盟最少。

Seattle led the league in 2012 (15.3 points per game), 2013 (14.4) and could add a third defensive scoring title by shutting down the Rams on Sunday.
西雅图在2012年以场均失15.3分排名第一,2013年是14.4分,如果周日能够在防守端统治公羊队的话那么就可以取得连续三个赛季的场均失分第一名。

On Wednesday, Bennett said total yards and points allowed are the statistics that matter most.
在周三的时候,Bennett表示场均对手总码数和场均失分是最最重要的技术统计。

''Those are two things you take into account. You don't want to allow points and you don't want to give up a lot of yards,'' Bennett said. ''When we give up 30 rushing yards we're thinking, 'Could we have given up 20?' It's one of those things where we're really ambitious about it when we go out there.’'
“那两个数据是你必须加入考虑范畴的。你不想丢分,你也不想丢太多的码数,”Bennett如是说,“当我们被人一档进攻打了30码跑攻的时候我们就在想,‘刚才我们防守有疏漏吗?我们刚才到底有没有机会把码数限到20以内呢?’这是我们上场比赛的时候会非常在意的一些地方之一。”

Whether this year's version of the Seahawks will be considered better than last season's squad that won the first Super Bowl in franchise history won't be known for another month. The 2013 version had better pass defense and scoring defense numbers. The 2014 version is far better at stopping the run. The ultimate tiebreaker - winning a title - goes in favor of the 2013 squad. For now.
我们并不知道这个赛季的海鹰队是否会比上赛季夺得队史首个冠军奖杯的海鹰队更强,直至一个月后一切都见分晓的时候。2013年那支海鹰队有着更好的传球防守和更低的场均失分。2014年版本在防跑上面远远强过去年。能够区分出这两个版本高下的最终决胜条件——赢下总冠军,现在是在2013年这支队身上。但只是现在。

''I think we're different. It's going to be hard to say you're better than the defense that won the Super Bowl - No. 1 in just about every category that you can be No. 1 in,'' Sherman said. ''So, just different, I think at the end of the day. You can ask me that question after the season and I'll probably have a better answer for you.''
“我觉得我们不一样了。要说自己的防守要好过一支赢得超级碗的球队确实是挺有风险的,因为能拿冠军的球队基本上在能得第一的所有方面都得了第一,”Sherman如是说,“所以,说来说去,我们只是变得有些不同了。或许你等到赛季结束之后你再来问我这些问题,我会给你一个更加明确的答案。”


原文出处:http://sports.yahoo.com/news/seahawks-defense-finding-place-league-history-223424065--nfl.html

评分

参与人数 2+26 收起 理由
gslzy1 + 11 很给力!
ray1010ray + 15 翻译辛苦了!

查看全部评分

 楼主| 发表于 2014-12-25 22:48 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 lihancheng 于 2014-12-25 22:54 编辑

本人学习英语还是颇有心得的,也自信有不错的水平,希望大家捧捧场哦~{:soso_e113:}
我不一定只翻译我大野驴的文章的,联盟诸强可能都会有关注。最近比较爱看海鹰的比赛,所以也会看一些相关的新闻。

因为现在读高三所以不能经常译文章,时不时吧。如果有空闲时间会译一些的。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-25 23:06 | 显示全部楼层
不错,只认得到abc的人纯顶
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-25 23:16 | 显示全部楼层
海鹰阵容里面有特别大嘴的,第一是Sherman,第二就是Bennett了。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-12-25 23:18 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
老全 发表于 2014-12-25 23:16
海鹰阵容里面有特别大嘴的,第一是Sherman,第二就是Bennett了。

哈哈看过Sherman的集锦,满场上都在跟对手喷垃圾话,但是带着这种很强的情绪打球的人也比较有感染力,打起来有激情,好看
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 00:56 | 显示全部楼层
85 bears best D ever
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 07:38 | 显示全部楼层
如能连拿两届碗,才有资格载入史册
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 08:11 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
KING_OF_SOUTH 发表于 2014-12-26 00:56 85 bears best D ever

求解释,不懂。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 08:39 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
KING_OF_SOUTH 发表于 2014-12-26 00:56
85 bears best D ever

我曾经有那一年熊队的全部视频。可惜硬盘坏了。。。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-12-26 08:48 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
S.R.911 发表于 2014-12-26 08:11
求解释,不懂。

意思是层主觉得85年的熊队的防守实力是历史最棒的
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-12-26 08:49 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
sgiugi 发表于 2014-12-26 08:39
我曾经有那一年熊队的全部视频。可惜硬盘坏了。。。

orz好可惜......我也才开始看球看了三个月多一些,对历史不太熟
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 08:52 | 显示全部楼层
这波五连胜中的防守就是无解的了
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 09:34 | 显示全部楼层
虽然海鹰的赛季失分只比雄狮少4分,但鉴于17周公羊@海鹰,而雄狮@包装工,失分差只会拉大。所以海鹰赛季场均失分排名联盟第一,也是板上钉钉的事情。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 10:46 | 显示全部楼层
楼主辛苦了哈{:soso_e142:}
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 11:13 | 显示全部楼层
海鹰确实是历史级的防守强队,尤其在今天这个规则明显保护传球的时代。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 12:47 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
看着好可怕的赶脚,我野驴怎么办?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-12-26 12:59 | 显示全部楼层
太败人品了吧,难道最后一场要输给公羊了吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

本版积分规则

archiver|手机版|小黑屋|达阵联盟-NFL-美式橄榄球中文网

GMT+8, 2024-11-1 06:49 , Processed in 0.162863 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表